Except I think that identifying G* with God is unhelpful. God is at
best an incoherent concept, which is part of the reason why theology
is a problematic word. G* is basically Truth by another name.
Bruno wants to use theology in its original Hellenistic sense - fine,
except he will have his work cut out explaining that this is how he
intends to use the word. Of course if he picks a completely new word
then he will need to explain this as well.
Cheers
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 12:16:29PM -0800, George Levy wrote:
> Bruno
> I am still thinking about the naming issue and I am not 100% satisfied
> with any suggestion. The field we are discussing is really at the
> intersection of three subjects: Theology, Physics and Psychology. This
> reminds me that about six years ago I wrote a book which was never
> published (I did not have the credentials and/or the book was too "far
> out" for the editors). I entitled the book "God, the World and I." In
> terms of your theory "God, the World and I" may correspond to G*, G and
> the first person.
>
--
*PS: A number of people ask me about the attachment to my email, which
is of type "application/pgp-signature". Don't worry, it is not a
virus. It is an electronic signature, that may be used to verify this
email came from me if you have PGP or GPG installed. Otherwise, you
may safely ignore this attachment.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
A/Prof Russell Standish Phone 8308 3119 (mobile)
Mathematics 0425 253119 (")
UNSW SYDNEY 2052 R.Standish.domain.name.hidden
Australia http://parallel.hpc.unsw.edu.au/rks
International prefix +612, Interstate prefix 02
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on Sun Jan 08 2006 - 17:14:22 PST