Rép : Quantum Immortality and Information Flow

From: Bruno Marchal <marchal.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 16:11:10 +0100

Le 03-déc.-05, à 15:14, Saibal Mitra a écrit :

> Yes, but it's a fact that there exists laws of physics. I am of the
> opinion
> that what really exists is an ensemble of algorithms and that the laws
> of
> physics is a consequence of this.

OK. (Except I am not sure that the existence of physical laws are a
fact, just an inference from facts).

> Whatever your starting point, you'll end
> up with an absolute measure over the set of all OMs.

That is an open question for me (absolute measure still does not make
sense for me and for ... the lobian machine).

But even if that is true it is not clear for me if such a measure could
be relevant.

But this is again the Relative/Absolute sampling debate. Once I got a
little bit more time I will explain why an absolute measure would need
an S5 modal logic, the one which cannot really appear in the lobian
talk ...

Sorry to invoke the lobian beast so often, but I'm only his humble
messenger ... ;)

Bruno

http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
Received on Mon Dec 05 2005 - 11:38:19 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:11 PST