Re: Quantum Immortality and Information Flow

From: Quentin Anciaux <quentin.anciaux.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 00:07:56 +0100

Le Samedi 26 Novembre 2005 18:47, Jesse Mazer a écrit :
Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
>I was thinking of people who accept some ensemble theory such as MWI, but
>don't believe in QTI. I must admit, I find it difficult to understand how
>even a dualist might justify (a) as being correct. Would anyone care to
>help?

What would be the meaning to accept solution a ?

Are we only sentient entities for a small(art) moment ?

It sounds stupid to only be sentient for a moment... just because a moment has
no meaning for entities like us. Like I like to repeat, what could it means
to not be self aware... ? Could we as first person perspective be "aware" of
not being "aware" ? It sounds non sense.

While I agree it is quite of topic.. this is something that I got lot of
interest into. Why are we looking for a consistent meaning of our own life ?

Quentin
Received on Sat Nov 26 2005 - 19:34:18 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:11 PST