Re: Quantum Immortality and Information Flow

From: Stephen Paul King <stephenk1.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 14:39:52 -0500

Dear Bruno,

    Are you claiming that the communicable part is to the non-communicable
part as the classical is to the quantum? The Non-cloning aspect of QM and
the copyability of the classical seems to be implied. Is this intentional?

Onward!

Stephen

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruno Marchal" <marchal.domain.name.hidden>
To: <Fabric-of-Reality.domain.name.hidden>
Cc: "Everything-List List" <everything-list.domain.name.hidden>
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 10:03 AM
Subject: Re: Quantum Immortality and Information Flow


snip
> Well, actually I hope it will gives the qubits.
> I am not contesting the Everett-Hartle-... Deutsch-Zurek explanation of
> how bits come from qubits. Just saying comp gives a path from bits to
> qubits too. A double path.
> It is the incompleteness phenomenon(*) which makes that path double, i.e.
> separated into a communicable part and a non communicable part explaining
> simultaneously quanta and qualia (I would argue).
Received on Fri Nov 18 2005 - 14:43:36 PST