Le 06-nov.-05, à 08:38, Russell Standish a écrit :
> On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 03:37:52PM -0500, Stephen Paul King wrote:
>> physics. BTW, I am still waiting to read an English version of your
>> Thesis.
>> That, I hope, might help me. Have you considered Google's translation
>> services?
>>
>
> With a little arm twisting, I might be tempted into assisting in
> translating this thesis. I have been poring over it during my book
> writing episode. With a Google translation of the LaTeX sources as a
> starting point, I think I could do it reasonably quickly...
Thanks. Unfortunately some people have already send me some automated
translations and until now I find them rather awful and hard to
understand.
Also, I think that my paper "the origin of physical laws", despite its
title, is better than my Lille thesis (except I pass over the graph
movie argument).
My last paper "Theoretical computer science and the natural science" is
still better. It contains new results based on the use of combinators,
and make a very clean summary of the interview of the (lobian)
universal machine. But it is still under press, and it is also short
and technical.
I am thinking about the "official" paper, but I am stuck by the abyss
existing in between physicists and logicians.
People interested should really buy some good introductory book on
logic, or study the Podnieks page:
http://www.ltn.lv/~podnieks/
Podnieks mentions the book by Mendelson which is really good indeed.
Best,
Bruno
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
Received on Tue Nov 08 2005 - 06:30:54 PST