Re: Let There Be Something

From: Hal Ruhl <HalRuhl.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 21:46:10 -0500

Hi Tom:

One of the goals of my search for a model was to explain why there is
an observed dynamic. The Somethings that are launched from my
Nothing/All pair include evolving Somethings [due to their
incompleteness]. This evolution causes states of universes resident
in the All to be given a period of a degree of reality in random
sequences - universe evolution.

All kinds of universe evolution take place. For example our universe
running backwards.

Speculation:

Such a universe is not observable by internal SAS, it is more like
reverse observable. [Perhaps call our type forward observable] This
type of universe may be irrational from a forward observers point of
view but this does not effect the existence of the backwards running
universe. Both may be forward observable by the Something which as I
discussed with Russell might be considered a conscious observer by
force of its containing conscious observers [forward ones?]. Is our
occasional feeling that we are experiencing something for the second
time leakage from the reverse observers? Interesting.

Hal Ruhl

At 11:18 AM 11/3/2005, you wrote:
>There was more to my post, which I've included below, which was
>meant to answer questions from multiple contributors here.
>
>Thanks, Hal Ruhl, for responding. Somethings coming from All AND
>Nothing seems just as mysterious as coming from one of them. And if
>the somethings which are generated are all possible somethings, then
>we are back at the same problem as something in particular coming from All.
Received on Thu Nov 03 2005 - 21:49:12 PST