Re: Let There Be Something

From: Hal Ruhl <HalRuhl.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 21:36:44 -0500

Hi Tom:

At 08:53 AM 11/2/2005, you wrote:

>Hal Ruhl wrote:
> > So as in the case of my Nothing and my All it seems
> > the apex of causation may be neither infinite regression
> > "or" termination but rather both [an "and"].
>
>I'm saying that the "All" is on equal ontological footing with the
>"Nothing". Pulling something out of Nothing is just as believable
>as pulling
>something out of All. I think Quentin touches on the total mystery of both:
>

As my posts point out re my model it is the simultaneous being
[existence, high degree of "reality"] of the Nothing and my All that
results in the launching of Somethings and all Somethings are
eventually launched over and over.

Hal Ruhl
Received on Wed Nov 02 2005 - 21:41:00 PST