Re: Let There Be Something

From: Hal Ruhl <HalRuhl.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 21:42:14 -0500

Hi Stathis:

At 08:19 PM 10/30/2005, you wrote:

>The same objection to the quest for a first cause applies to the
>quest for ultimate meaning: you can always ask, if the meaning (or
>cause, or purpose) of x is y, what's the meaning (or cause, or
>purpose) of y? If you assert that y is special because it is the
>"ultimate" meaning (or cause, or purpose), then why not make the
>same assertion of x?

The interesting thing is that a first cause if it can have reality is
on my list. Personally I see it as the line item that is the list itself.

Hal Ruhl
Received on Sun Oct 30 2005 - 22:44:12 PST