I have not dealt with Mercury's orbit. My theory can explain the double
slit results just as well as any other theory, better than most. I have
not tried to calculate the muon magnetic moment. My theory does however
predict that a muon is nothing more than a high energy electron that
has obtain its energy by capturing the entron of a high energy photon.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jesse Mazer [mailto:lasermazer.domain.name.hidden]
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 4:59 PM
To: jross.domain.name.hidden; everything-list.domain.name.hidden.com
Subject: RE: Neutrino shield idea
John Ross wrote:
>
>To the best of my knowledge and belief, my theory successfully predicts
>all known experimental knowledge of physics, chemistry and optics and
>does so better and simpler than any other theory. I am working on a
>list of predictions of new things that can be proved experimentally.
Does your theory in its current form reproduce all these predictions
quantitatively, or just in terms of word-pictures? Have you made a
detailed
study of general relativity and the standard model of quantum physics to
see
if you understand all the main predictions made by these theories? Can
you
quantitatively reproduce GR's prediction of the precession of the
perihelion
of Mercury's orbit, for example (see
http://phyun5.ucr.edu/~wudka/Physics7/Notes_www/node98.html ) or the
extremely accurate prediction of the electron and muon magnetic moment
anomaly by quantum electrodynamics (see
http://latticeqcd.blogspot.com/2005/06/most-accurate-theory-we-have.html
)?
Can you predict more basic things like the interference pattern seen on
the
screen in the double-slit experiment, and how this pattern changes when
you
measure which slit the particle travels through?
Jesse
Received on Mon Oct 10 2005 - 20:34:24 PDT