As I understand it a photon is a luxon as is a gluon and a neutrino
is a tardyon.
Hal Ruhl
At 04:49 PM 10/10/2005, you wrote:
>I think the beta decay model is wrong where it predicts neutrinos are
>basically different from photons. I understand neutrinos travel at the
>speed of light. Only photons travel at the speed of light.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Saibal Mitra [mailto:smitra.domain.name.hidden]
>Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 4:30 PM
>To: John Ross; everything-list.domain.name.hidden
>Subject: Re: Neutrino shield idea
>
>
>This means that beta decay proves your model wrong.
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "John Ross" <jross.domain.name.hidden>
>To: "'Stephen Paul King'" <stephenk1.domain.name.hidden>;
><everything-list.domain.name.hidden>
>Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2005 12:35 AM
>Subject: RE: Neutrino shield idea
>
>
> > Thanks for the paper relating to detection of "low energy" neutrinos.
> > However, according to my model, neutrinos are very, very high energy
> > photons (off everybody's chart, except mine).
> >
> > Therefore, if my model is correct, then low energy neutrinos would
> > merely be the photons we are familiar with and would be very easy to
> > detect.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Stephen Paul King [mailto:stephenk1.domain.name.hidden]
> > Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 12:54 PM
> > To: everything-list.domain.name.hidden
> > Subject: Neutrino shield idea
> >
> >
> > Howdy!
> >
> > I friend of mine has worked on a related idea that might help this
>
> > inverstigation. Please see:
> >
> > http://davidwoolsey.com/physics/ideas/neutrinoscope/index.html
> >
> > Kindest regards,
> >
> > Stephen
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "John Ross" <jross.domain.name.hidden>
> > To: <daddycaylor.domain.name.hidden>
> > Cc: <everything-list.domain.name.hidden>
> > Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 11:57 AM
> > Subject: RE: ROSS MODEL OF THE UNIVERSE - The Simplest Yet Theory of
> > Everything
> >
> >
> > > Yes. But building a neutrino shield would be difficult.
> >
Received on Mon Oct 10 2005 - 17:52:32 PDT