This means that beta decay proves your model wrong.
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Ross" <jross.domain.name.hidden>
To: "'Stephen Paul King'" <stephenk1.domain.name.hidden>;
<everything-list.domain.name.hidden>
Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2005 12:35 AM
Subject: RE: Neutrino shield idea
> Thanks for the paper relating to detection of "low energy" neutrinos.
> However, according to my model, neutrinos are very, very high energy
> photons (off everybody's chart, except mine).
>
> Therefore, if my model is correct, then low energy neutrinos would
> merely be the photons we are familiar with and would be very easy to
> detect.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Paul King [mailto:stephenk1.domain.name.hidden]
> Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 12:54 PM
> To: everything-list.domain.name.hidden
> Subject: Neutrino shield idea
>
>
> Howdy!
>
> I friend of mine has worked on a related idea that might help this
> inverstigation. Please see:
>
> http://davidwoolsey.com/physics/ideas/neutrinoscope/index.html
>
> Kindest regards,
>
> Stephen
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Ross" <jross.domain.name.hidden>
> To: <daddycaylor.domain.name.hidden>
> Cc: <everything-list.domain.name.hidden>
> Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 11:57 AM
> Subject: RE: ROSS MODEL OF THE UNIVERSE - The Simplest Yet Theory of
> Everything
>
>
> > Yes. But building a neutrino shield would be difficult.
>
Received on Fri Oct 07 2005 - 19:35:44 PDT