Re: Summary of seed ideas for my developing TOE - 'The Sentient Centered Theo...

From: Hal Ruhl <HalRuhl.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 20:16:05 -0400

Hi John:

I do not know if one should use the word Theory but what strikes me
is the convergence I see in numerous lines of thought. I see my
model as having many features in common with Russell's even though
some of the differences may not be subject to complete
reconciliation. I also see a place for Bruno's consistent histories,
consistent extensions computational hypothesis approach as a sub
component of mine. I have been made aware of others that fit the
same pattern of convergence towards what appears to me to be a single
simple model.

The apparent convergence from such different starting places and
ensuing seemingly incompatible lines of thought I find
remarkable. It makes me believe that the model at the apex of this
convergence is the correct one as far as we can ever know it.

Hal Ruhl

At 04:56 PM 10/1/2005, you wrote:
>Marc, Tom, and others who care:
>
>if TOE is hard to identify, even harder to select, and
>the hardest to make it reasonable, why "TOE"?
>because some reputable old professors started it?
>Reminds me of the cobbler-apprentiss who dared to
>announce that the king has no cloths on.
>
>John Mikes
Received on Mon Oct 03 2005 - 20:18:41 PDT