Re: Book preview: Theory of Nothing

From: Hal Ruhl <HalRuhl.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 13:33:27 -0400

Hi Russell:

In my previous post on this thread I was looking for your commentary re a
comparison between your "In this book, I propose a Plenitude of all
descriptions, containing at least one that *is* a conscious observer" [page
53] and my All and its Somethings.

If we allow that a Something can be conscious by virtue of its containing
kernels having SAS and that the All = your Plenitude have I in my model
derived your proposal from a lower level?

For reference I just posted the latest revision of my model.

Hal Ruhl
Received on Fri Sep 16 2005 - 13:40:43 PDT