Re: MODERATOR'S NOTE: Theology Discussion

From: Russell Standish <r.standish.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 09:52:39 +1000

I commiserate with you. I finally left FOR because of the moderation
policy - that, and the endless waffle that would have been prevented
had more technical language been possible in the first place.

Anything of substance seems to get ported to the everything list
eventually anyway!

Cheers

On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 05:48:01PM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
...

>
> Sometimes the "moderation posts" are very interesting by themselves. It
> is a little sad that this one is authoritative and does not admit
> replies (in the FOR-list). (Given that my point was really that
> "theology" could be amenable to scientific discourse, once we make some
> assumptions).
>

...

>
> Alan, how could I communicate? If I explain in plain english I will
> look mystical and moderated out. If I explain the "mystical" out, then
> I will look technical, and moderate out again.
>

-- 
*PS: A number of people ask me about the attachment to my email, which
is of type "application/pgp-signature". Don't worry, it is not a
virus. It is an electronic signature, that may be used to verify this
email came from me if you have PGP or GPG installed. Otherwise, you
may safely ignore this attachment.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
A/Prof Russell Standish                  Phone 8308 3119 (mobile)
Mathematics                         	       0425 253119 (")
UNSW SYDNEY 2052         	         R.Standish.domain.name.hidden             
Australia                                http://parallel.hpc.unsw.edu.au/rks
            International prefix  +612, Interstate prefix 02
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Mon Aug 01 2005 - 19:58:23 PDT