Re: The Time Deniers

From: Hal Ruhl <HalRuhl.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 14:57:49 -0400

Hi Lee:

At 09:47 PM 7/5/2005, you wrote:

snip


>Where I join you (in failing to understand) is what happens as
>the OM becomes of zero length. I did not say *the limit as
>it becomes zero*, I said "zero". It's almost as though some
>people take this as license to suppose that time is not a
>necessary ingredient or even that time does not exist:

snip

The dynamic I speak of in my approach can give instantations of "being" to
the preexisting states in many ways. For example: isolated states, all
states a universe contains simultaneously, and clusters of states that
would be closely coupled in a succession string of states. As "being"
moved within the system the last example would be like a pulse of "being"
with some non zero pulse width over the dimension of successor states for a
particular universe. This might be a model for consciousness, thinking,
continuity, observation, time, etc.

Hal Ruhl
Received on Thu Jul 07 2005 - 15:02:54 PDT