Re: One more question about measure

From: Quentin Anciaux <quentin.anciaux.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 03:22:07 +0200

Le Samedi 25 Juin 2005 18:51, Bruno Marchal a écrit :
> Not really because you assume our eyes are bounded. Any finite machine
> running forever recurs but not infinite or universal one.
>
> Bruno

Yes I assume my eyes are bounded... because they are, physically speaking they
are...

And if I understand you correctly, you are saying that we are universal
machine (or we are part of it) so that we can't recurs... But as I have
showed, what I can see is finite (without taking into accound brain states
which is more than 2 states for a neuron, 2 states or electrical states of
the brains and not taking in account chemicals properties is not brain
states)... what ever event a possible observer which could see all is
finite... I take 100000x100000 resolution, taking an higher resolution will
just reveal better and better detail, but we do not see infinite detail...
(and I don't conceive my consciousness able to see/understand infinite
detail). But if I read that an universal machine runing forever can't repeat,
that means that the machine will "see" better details each time... but what
does it means for us ? do you mean that we have to see better and better the
world ? has we get asymptotically to an infinite age we should be aware of
more details ?

Quentin
Received on Sat Jun 25 2005 - 21:27:04 PDT