Bruno Marchal wrote:
>Then in another post you just say:
>
>
>>It's a bit hard for me to come up with a satisfactory answer to this
>>problem, because I don't start from the assumption of a physical universe
>>at all--like Bruno, I'm trying to start from a measure on observer-moments
>>and hope that somehow the appearance of a physical universe can be
>>recovered from the subjective probabilities experienced by observers
>
>
>And this answers the question.
That was actually me who wrote that, not Hal Finney. But in reply to that
comment, Hal wrote:
>I have a similar perspective. However I think it will turn out that the
>simplest mathematical description of an observer-moment will involve a Big
>Bang. That is, describe a universe, describe natural laws, and let the
>OM evolve. This is the foundation for saying that the universe is real.
Jesse
Received on Tue Jun 21 2005 - 11:20:30 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:10 PST