rmiller wrote:
>
>At 11:03 AM 6/15/2005, Jesse Mazer wrote:
>>I wrote:
>>
>>>No, I don't think they don't all have to have the same volume,
>>
>>Whoops, weird double negative here...that should read "I don't think they
>>all have to have the same volume".
>>
>>Jesse
>>
>>
>"must have"
>"should have"
>"are required to have"
Aw, c'mon, now you're just being nitpicky--"have to have" is perfectly good
grammar! I googled it and found it used all over the place, including in an
example on the BBC "Learning English" page at
http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish/grammar/learnit/learnitv127.shtml
Jesse
Received on Thu Jun 16 2005 - 01:29:36 PDT