Le 01-juin-05, à 15:00, Saibal Mitra a écrit :
> Hi Norman,
>
> I entirely agree with Julian Barbour. A fundamental notion of time
> would act as a pointer indicating what is real (things that are
> happening now) and what was real and what will be real. Most of us
> here on the everything list believe that in a certain sense
> 'everything exists', so the notion of a fundamental time would be
> contrary to this idea. I think that that most here on the list would
> consider time as a first person phenomena
Indeed. (SGrz pour those who knows). I would like to know if Norman and
Saibal and others agree that there is nothing special with time. Why
does not Julian Barbour talk about space-time capsule? (Or does he?)
I think space is also a first person phenomena. OK?
Bruno
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
Received on Wed Jun 01 2005 - 09:28:50 PDT