Re: White Rabbit vs. Tegmark

From: Alastair Malcolm <amalcolm.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 09:47:39 +0100

----- Original Message -----
From: Alastair Malcolm <amalcolm.domain.name.hidden>
To: Patrick Leahy <jpl.domain.name.hidden>
Cc: Everything-List <everything-list.domain.name.hidden>
Sent: 27 May 2005 09:52
Subject: Re: White Rabbit vs. Tegmark
.
.
> But I agree that going any further with particular predictions,
particularly
> after factoring in Tegmark's other levels, is likely to prove, shall we
say,
> at least a little way off ;)
>
> Alastair

Perhaps I should have added, less pessimistically, that the simplicty
requirement itself could conceivably lead to in-principle verifiable
predictions (eg that we are almost certainly in the simplest possible
universe containing properly self-aware structures (Yes, I know that idea
itself leads to all sorts of reference class considerations)). These kinds
of predictions may not distinguish certain different candidate measure
bases, but if fulfilled would boost the credibility of AUH ideas generally.

Alastair
Received on Sat May 28 2005 - 05:03:19 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:10 PST