Re: Plaga

From: Saibal Mitra <smitra.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 18:50:01 +0200

Bruno was quoting another Aet from a parallel world :)



Quoting Eugen Leitl <eugen.domain.name.hidden>:

>
> If you expect to be quoted correctly, stop posting HTML-only.
>
> On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 08:45:34AM -0500, aet.radal ssg wrote:
> > HEY! BRUNO - I, (aet) didn't say that.&nbsp;Someone else&nbsp;did. I was
> quoting them. If you're going to quote somebody, I suggest you get it
> right.<BR><BR>----- Original Message ----- <BR>From: "Bruno Marchal"
> <MARCHAL.domain.name.hidden><BR>To: "aet.radal ssg"
> <AET.RADAL.SSG.domain.name.hidden><BR>Subject: Re: Plaga <BR>Date: Wed, 25 May 2005
> 20:40:21 +0200 <BR><BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; Le 25-mai-05, à 17:59,
> aet.radal ssg a écrit : <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; &gt; From the initial page from
> the included link to the archive: "I'm <BR>&gt; &gt; no physicist so I
> don't know for sure that these implications <BR>&gt; &gt; would <BR>&gt;
> &gt; follow, but I am very doubtful that interworld communication is
> consistent <BR>&gt; &gt; with the basics of quantum mechanics.&nbsp; The
> fact that this paper has not <BR>&gt; &gt; been published in peer reviewed
> journals in 7 years indicates that it <BR>&gt; &gt; probably doesn't work."
> <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; Ooooooh... you should not make inferences like that. I
> could give <BR>&gt; you 10,000 reasons for not publishing. But I have not
> the time <BR>&gt; because I have a deadline today! <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; I red
> Plaga's paper. It is extremely interesting. It belongs to the <BR>&gt;
> family of Weinberg's result. Some hoped that a slight <BR>&gt;
> delinearisation of QM would "explain the collapse". Reasoning a-la <BR>&gt;
> Weinberg Plaga shows that it is the contrary which happens. Not <BR>&gt;
> only we keep the MW but they became more "real" in some sense. It <BR>&gt;
> shows the MWI is stable for slight "variation of the SWE". this <BR>&gt;
> confirms MWI in a deeper way. It shows quantum non linearity <BR>&gt;
> contradicts thermodynamics! This is a powerful argument in favor of
> <BR>&gt; both pure linear QM and MWI. <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; (Good for me, it
> shows nature confirms the lobian machine's <BR>&gt; inability to observe
> kestrels and starlings when they look enough <BR>&gt; closely to
> themselves....) <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; Bruno <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt;
> http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ <BR><BR>
> >
> > --
> > <p>___________________________________________________________<br>Sign-up
> for Ads Free at Mail.com<br>
> > <a
> href="http://mail01.mail.com/scripts/payment/adtracking.cgi?bannercode=adsfreejump01"
> target="_blank">http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup</a></p>
> > <BR>
> --
> Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a>
> ______________________________________________________________
> ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.leitl.org
> 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
>




-- 
_____________________________________________________________________
Nu 12 maanden gratis Live Eredivisievoetbal bij 20 Mb ADSL voor maar
EUR 39,95 per maand. Bestel op www.versatel.nl/voetbal
Received on Thu May 26 2005 - 13:08:26 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:10 PST