Re: Plaga

From: Bruno Marchal <marchal.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 20:40:21 +0200

Le 25-mai-05, à 17:59, aet.radal ssg a écrit :

> From the initial page from the included link to the archive: "I'm no
> physicist so I don't know for sure that these implications would
> follow, but I am very doubtful that interworld communication is
> consistent
> with the basics of quantum mechanics.  The fact that this paper has not
> been published in peer reviewed journals in 7 years indicates that it
> probably doesn't work."

Ooooooh... you should not make inferences like that. I could give you
10,000 reasons for not publishing. But I have not the time because I
have a deadline today!

I red Plaga's paper. It is extremely interesting. It belongs to the
family of Weinberg's result. Some hoped that a slight delinearisation
of QM would "explain the collapse". Reasoning a-la Weinberg Plaga shows
that it is the contrary which happens. Not only we keep the MW but they
became more "real" in some sense. It shows the MWI is stable for
slight "variation of the SWE". this confirms MWI in a deeper way. It
shows quantum non linearity contradicts thermodynamics! This is a
powerful argument in favor of both pure linear QM and MWI.

(Good for me, it shows nature confirms the lobian machine's inability
to observe kestrels and starlings when they look enough closely to
themselves....)

Bruno

http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
Received on Wed May 25 2005 - 14:49:59 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:10 PST