RE: Sociological approach

From: Brent Meeker <meekerdb.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 14:06:52 -0000

That's a rather contemptous evaluation of a website that reports on the
work of some very good physicist, e.g. Zeh, Joos, Kim, and Tegmark. Do you
have any substantive comment? Did you read any of the papers?

Brent Meeker

 -----Original Message-----
From: aet.radal ssg [mailto:aet.radal.ssg.domain.name.hidden]
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 7:49 PM
To: everything-list.domain.name.hidden
Subject: RE: Sociological approach


  "See http://decoherence.de "? It was good for a laugh, not much else.


  ----- Original Message -----
  From: "Brent Meeker"
  To: "Everything-List"
  Subject: RE: Sociological approach
  Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 22:02:48 -0000

>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: rmiller [mailto:rmiller.domain.name.hidden]
> > Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 5:40 PM
> > To: Patrick Leahy
> > Cc: aet.radal ssg; EverythingList; Giu1i0 Pri5c0
> > Subject: Re: Sociological approach
> ...
> > More to the point, if you happen to know why the mere act of
> > measurement--even at a distance-- "induces" a probability collapse,
I'd
> > love to hear it.
>
> Measurements are just interactions that project onto "pointer spaces"
we're
> interested in. There's nothing physically different from any other
> interaction.
> See http://decoherence.de/
>
> Brent Meeker

  --
  ___________________________________________________________
  Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com
  http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup
Received on Tue May 24 2005 - 18:01:03 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:10 PST