George:
Wikipedia is a good "Nachschlag" source with a caveat:
not everything is 'the final and correct word' in it. There are NO bible-proof concepts at all, and Wikipedia accepts good descriptopns and then criticism of them.
Just remember the discussions on this list....
John Mikes
----- Original Message -----
From: George Levy
To: Everything List
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 12:39 AM
Subject: Wikipedia: depository for defining our concepts?
Dear list members,
I have found that the Wikipedia encyclopedia (composed and edited by the public) can be a great source of linked information regarding the topic of our discussion and can be used by beginners in our list to become familiar with the topics that we discuss. I suppose that if our group generates new ideas, we could simply add them up to Wikipedia and add the appropriate links to and from related topics.
Internal Links found in Wikipedia
<>
Many-worlds interpretation
Consciousness
Quantum mind
quantum suicide
modal realism
possible worlds
multiverse
quantum decoherence
multiple histories
many-minds interpretation
quantum immortality
holomovement
AND MUCH MUCH MORE....
Some external Links found in Wikipedia
On Many-Minds Interpretations of Quantum Theory
Against Many-Worlds Interpretations (
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9703089)
Everett's Relative-State Formulation of Quantum Mechanics (
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qm-everett/)
Michael Price's Everett FAQ (
http://www.hedweb.com/manworld.htm)
Max Tegmark's web page (
http://www.hep.upenn.edu/~max/everett.html)
Many Worlds & Parallel Universes (
http://timetravelportal.com/viewtopic.php?t=288)
Many Worlds is a "lost cause" (
http://www.mth.kcl.ac.uk/~streater/lostcauses.html#XII) according to R. F. Streater
AND MUCH MUCH MORE
George
Received on Tue May 17 2005 - 08:48:57 PDT