RE: many worlds theory of immortality

From: Stathis Papaioannou <stathispapaioannou.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 11:25:42 +1000

Did you mean to say a system *not* algorithmically compressible is defined
as random?

--Stathis Papaioannou

>Jonathan Colvin writes:
> > Pondering on this, it raises an interesting question. Can we
>differentiate
> > between worlds that are (or appear to be) rule-based, and those that are
> > purely random?
>
>The usual approach is that a system which is algorithmically compressible
>is defined as random. A rule-based universe has a short program that
>determines its evolution, or creates its state. A random universe has
>no program much smaller than itself which can encode its information.
>
>Hal Finney
>

_________________________________________________________________
MSN Messenger v7. Download now: http://messenger.ninemsn.com.au/
Received on Mon May 09 2005 - 21:29:11 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:10 PST