Re: Belief Statements

From: Hal Ruhl <>
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 17:58:52 -0500

Hi Stephen:

I took a look at Julian Barbour's "time capsules" and his Nows may be like
my kernels but in my (2) the sequence of kernels is inconsistent with its
past due to the "=>>" dynamic as I have indicated.

A sequence of kernels may for a number of steps look like one could derive
something fundamental for the sequence but this itself is an illusion. The
inconsistent dynamic is the fundamental and contains no fundamental rules
in its inconsistency let alone any that could be deduced from within the

Hal Ruhl
Received on Sun Jan 30 2005 - 18:00:40 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:10 PST