Re: Belief Statements

From: Stephen Paul King <stephenk1.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 18:29:48 -0500

Dear Hal,

    What your defining seems to me to be a NOT map or else it is a mere
random map. There is no consistent definition of an "inconsistent" map
otherwise, IMHO. Please explain how I am wrong. ;-)

    Why not a map that is "a path where the information associated with each
step is consistent to some degree /delta with the information available
about the prior steps"?

Stephen

----- Original Message -----
From: "Hal Ruhl" <HalRuhl.domain.name.hidden>
To: <everything-list.domain.name.hidden>
Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2005 3:43 PM
Subject: RE: Belief Statements


>I meant to define the symbol "=>>" as:
>
>
> "=>>" is a path over kernels where each new step is inconsistent with
> prior steps.
>
> Hal Ruhl
>
>
Received on Sat Jan 29 2005 - 18:35:16 PST