Re: Belief Statements

From: Hal Ruhl <HalRuhl.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 20:16:15 -0500

Hi Russell:

My dynamic in part produces worlds that appear to have time as a property
but also produces all kinds of worlds that have no time in the sense of
there being any ordered sequence. There are also "worlds" that are just a
single kernel that is given physical reality in a manner commensurate with
the features of the dynamic.

Hal


At 07:40 PM 1/9/2005, you wrote:
>A compromise on these two views occurs through my assumption of "Time"
> being a necessary property of observerhood. Sure atemporal worlds
> exist, but there's nobody in them to observe them. Similarly, Hal
> Ruhl's dynamic process is simply the process of observation.
>
> Cheers
Received on Sun Jan 09 2005 - 20:19:05 PST