Re: An All/Nothing multiverse model

From: Hal Ruhl <HalRuhl.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 11:17:00 -0500

When I said in my previous post:

"The All of course contains a kernel re the founding definition and thus
there is an infinitely nested potential to have All/Nothing pairs."

I meant to add that this seemed necessary to the system in that the origin
of the dynamic basically destroys [Nothing, All] pairs but there is an
infinite potential to form new Nothings.

The infinite nesting in this definition should not effect the zero
information of the All because kernels that are definitions [is, is not]
pairs can be balanced by an [is not, is] definitional pair kernel which
defines the same entities.

I think that gets me rather close to what I set out to do.

Hal
Received on Mon Dec 27 2004 - 11:19:10 PST