Re: An All/Nothing multiverse model

From: Hal Ruhl <HalRuhl.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 17:39:54 -0500

Hi John:

At 04:59 PM 11/26/2004, you wrote:
>And why would 'Nothing' CHOOSE to SELECT anything?
>Is there in 'Nothing' "something" that acts?
>You wrotre "there is no reason why not", OK,, but why yes?

Look at the original post. The Nothing does not and can not "chose"
anything but is forced to answer an inescapable question i.e. does it
persist. The only way to do so is to breach the boundary between it and
the All

>Furthermore in ALL with no (net) info there cannot be subcomponents, which
>does mean a net info once chosen.
>Does 'Nothing' destroy ALL by that?
>What are the (nonexisting info) MAIN components of ALL?

You miss the essence of the process - the evolution of a Something is a
random dynamic. The division associated with a given Something is never
static and proceeds without design and at any stage there are an infinite
number of them evolving - the spontaneous symmetry breaking of the Nothing
breaching the boundary repeats and repeats. - i.e. no selection.

Hal
Received on Fri Nov 26 2004 - 18:25:53 PST