Re: An All/Nothing multiverse model

From: Hal Ruhl <HalRuhl.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 16:36:28 -0500

Hi John:

I am trying to make the model independent of what might be the detail
structure of individual universes within it.

Hal

At 10:41 AM 11/21/2004, you wrote:
>Hal:
>how about this:
>
>a 'concept' is THE part of ALL cut (limited?) by topical boundaries into a
>(topical) model disregarding other connections and e/affects.
>Our reductionist science uses such restrictions because of our incapability
>to encompass a wider domain of ALL into our mental function. (I am not the
>best in formulating).
>
>John Mikes
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Hal Ruhl" <HalRuhl.domain.name.hidden>
>To: <everything-list.domain.name.hidden>
>Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2004 11:32 PM
>Subject: Re: An All/Nothing multiverse model
>
>
> > I was asked about "concepts".
> >
> > I would define "concept" as any division of the All into two sub
> > components, each of the sub components is a concept.
> >
> > Usefullness of a concept as judged by a SAS [if they exist] is not an
>issue.
> >
> > Hal
> >
> >
Received on Sun Nov 21 2004 - 16:40:57 PST