Re: Fw: An All/Nothing multiverse model

From: Hal Ruhl <HalRuhl.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:03:33 -0500

All members of [is,is not] definitional pairs including the [All, Nothing]
pair have a "conceptual" foundation within the All. Why would the [All,
Nothing} pair be the only one denied a mutual and concurrent "physical"
expression?

Hal
Received on Wed Nov 17 2004 - 09:06:14 PST