Re: An All/Nothing multiverse model

From: Hal Ruhl <HalRuhl.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 12:10:26 -0500

Hi Georges:


At 08:16 AM 11/14/2004, you wrote:
>Hal Ruhl wrote:
> >
> > 4) A Something: A division of the All into two subparts.
>
>That too, sounds bad to me. It might well be that the only something that
>deserve the title of Something would be the All itself. Everything else
>might appear so only in our minds (and/or in other types of minds).
>
>Georges.

I believe my use of the term "Something" in the text of the justification
is consistent with my definition. One must allow for the case that the
All could have internal boundaries of some sort.

Hal
Received on Sun Nov 14 2004 - 12:51:07 PST