Hello Jan
You make me discover the new (?)
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qm-manyworlds/#7
It could help. Quite nice.
You can also search for Rubin, or Everett, locality, many worlds ...
in the Los Alamos archive
http://arxiv.org/ (click on the "find" at
"quantum physics").
Many question remain, sure.
B.
At 13:32 15/07/04 +0200, Jan Harms wrote:
>Dear Bruno, Dear All
>
>A few days ago, I was reading one of your (Bruno's) papers (I think it was
>"Computation, Consciousness and the Quantum"). You wrote that not only the
>apparent QM randomness is removed by the MWI (this point I understand) but
>also that QM becomes local if one accepts the MWI. Since then I was
>thinking about it and I could not resolve all doubt. Locality is
>quantified by the Bell inequalities. And these inequalities should still
>be applicable in the MWI since randomness per se will still exist in the
>many worlds (at least some sort of classical randomness of macroscopic
>systems). Since you say that by taking the bird perspective on the many
>worlds, we do not find any nonlocalities, my problem now is, that I do not
>see how to implement the fact that many worlds exist in order to prove
>that the Bell inequalities are always fulfilled (i.e. that QM is local).
>In other words, what is the MW bird perspective Bell inequality? Can
>someone help me? Are there papers which discuss MWI and locality?
>
>Thanks
>Jan
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
Received on Thu Jul 15 2004 - 11:00:59 PDT