Re: Then I can jump in with my bias....

From: Hal Ruhl <HalRuhl.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 18:41:23 -0400

Hi George:

The idea at least for my point of view is more along the lines that the
multiverse is a form of Nothing something like 256/256 is a form of 1 and
[256/256 - 239/239] is another form of zero.

By the way the idea is that space itself expands. This mechanism does not
slow photons but rather increases their wavelength.

Hal


At 05:07 PM 5/22/2004, you wrote:
>Ron,
>
>It seems most logical, to me anyway, that the Universe is truly infinite
>in time and space. Nothing
>created it, it will never end, and that is more logical, to me, than
>arising from nothingness.
>
>The whole modern concept of big bang etc. is mostly based on Hubble’s red
>shift.
>When I read articles about the cosmos’ origins and recent astronomy
>discoveries,
>I keep imagining immense distances and all kinds of possible ATTENUATIONS
>of light and gravity
>from distances that we haven’t seen. At least not yet Gravity from further
>reaches of the same U slows
>light photons and therefore RED SHIFTS the light. I know, the same general
>gravity should act
>the same everywhere and therefore not attenuate, but I can imagine a
>relative kind of attenuation
>because the light or gravity photon or wave does become affected by all
>sorts of local gravities
>on its way to us. Why not just like the way light is bent around Mercury
>or gravity by Jupiter?
>The immense distances would allow for multiple interactions and a gradual
>slowing or red shift.
>
>So we don’t need the big bang. The church likes it because it allows for a
>creator.
>
>And the missing energy or mass or dark matter….
>Why not just our parallel universe operating in a kind of 180 opposite
>direction from ours.
>Where else would those positrons and other fleeting particles have to go?
>Into our sister Universe, I
>would guess.
>
>I have been looking for a forum to express these views……..and since I know
>of no one else….
>Everything-list people might be it.
>
>I now humbly wait for rebuttals and offers to go elsewhere.
>
>George
Received on Sat May 22 2004 - 18:45:09 PDT