I think that "psychological time" fits the bill. The observer needs a
a temporal dimension in which to appreciate differences between
states.
"Physical time" presupposes a physics, which I haven't done in
"Occam".
It is obviously a little more structured than an ordering. A space
dimension is insufficient for an observer to appreciate differences,
isn't it?
Cheers
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 02:11:07PM +0100, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> Hi Russell,
>
> Let me try to be a little more specific. You say in your Occam paper
> at http://parallel.hpc.unsw.edu.au/rks/docs/occam/node4.html
>
> "The first assumption to be made is that observers will find themselves
> embedded in a temporal dimension. A Turing machine requires time to
> separate the sequence of states it occupies as it performs a computation.
> Universal Turing machines are models of how humans compute things, so it is
> possible that all conscious observers are capable of universal computation.
> Yet for our present purposes, it is not necessary to assume observers are
> capable of universal computation, merely that observers are embedded in
> time. "
>
> Are you meaning physical time, psychological time, or just a (linear)
> order? I am just
> trying to have a better understanding.
>
> Bruno
>
>
>
>
>
>
> At 18:00 23/02/04 +1100, Russell Standish wrote:
> >Comments interspersed.
> >
> >On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 07:15:45AM -0500, Kory Heath wrote:
> >>
> >> I understand this perspective, but for what it's worth, I'm profoundly
> >out
> >> of sympathy with it. In my view, computation universality is the real
> >key -
> >> life and consciousness are going to pop up in any universe that's
> >> computation universal, as long as the universe is big enough and/or it
> >> lasts long enough. (And there's always enough time and space in the
> >> Mathiverse!)
> >
> >Computational universality is not sufficient for open-ended evolution
> >of life. In fact we don't what is sufficient, as evidenced by it being
> >an open problem (see Bedau et al., Artificial Life 6, 363.)
> >
> >I also suspect that it is not necessary for the evolution of SASes,
> >but this is obvious a debatable point.
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
A/Prof Russell Standish Director
High Performance Computing Support Unit, Phone 9385 6967, 8308 3119 (mobile)
UNSW SYDNEY 2052 Fax 9385 6965, 0425 253119 (")
Australia R.Standish.domain.name.hidden
Room 2075, Red Centre http://parallel.hpc.unsw.edu.au/rks
International prefix +612, Interstate prefix 02
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on Tue Feb 24 2004 - 17:20:54 PST