Re: Is the universe computable?

From: Eugen Leitl <eugen.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:02:07 +0100

On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 03:50:42PM +0100, Bruno Marchal wrote:

> What I mean is that their arithmetical property are independent
> of us. Do you think those people believe that the proposition
> "17 is prime" is meaningless without a human in the neighborhood?

Of course it is meaningless. Natural numbers are representation
clusters by infoprocessing systems: currently machines or animals.
Pebbles can't count themselves, obviously.

No realization without representation.

I have no trouble seeing the universe as artifact from some production
system (but that metalayer be transcendent by definition), but assuming
universe exists because numbers "exist" does strike me
as a yet another faith.

-- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a>
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07078, 11.61144 http://www.leitl.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
http://moleculardevices.org http://nanomachines.net



Received on Mon Jan 12 2004 - 10:29:52 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:09 PST