Re: Quantum accident survivor

From: Russell Standish <R.Standish.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 14:12:18 +1100 (EST)

Not much, because of the effect of decoherence.

David Barrett-Lennard wrote:
>
> I have a feeling some of these points of view are not falsifiable (and
> therefore somewhat meaningless). An individual that is about to
> experience a QM immortality episode can't perform additional experiments
> to answer (philosophical) questions about his identity. The only
> observable is the survivor who can talk about who he is and what he
> remembers.
>
> Please note that my understanding of QM is rather lame... Doesn't MWI
> require some interaction between branches in order to explain things
> like interference patterns in the two slit experiment? What does this
> mean for the concept of "identity"?
>
> - David
>
>
>



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
A/Prof Russell Standish Director
High Performance Computing Support Unit, Phone 9385 6967, 8308 3119 (mobile)
UNSW SYDNEY 2052 Fax 9385 6965, 0425 253119 (")
Australia R.Standish.domain.name.hidden
Room 2075, Red Centre http://parallel.hpc.unsw.edu.au/rks
            International prefix +612, Interstate prefix 02
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wed Nov 05 2003 - 22:14:51 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:08 PST