R: Quantum Probability and Decision Theory
This message
: [
Message body
] [ More options (
top
,
bottom
) ]
Related messages
: [
Next message
] [
Previous message
]
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
From
: scerir <
scerir.domain.name.hidden
>
Date
: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 19:18:44 +0100
[Joao Leao]
What we lack is a genuinely quantum model of
computation that could be mathematically tractable as the Turing or Post
models and can account for entanglement in all its glory.
As far as I know you can describe certain classes of entanglement
by means of Borromean rings, which are beautiful and sometimes
also unpredictable. That is not much indeed, just something!
http://www.liv.ac.uk/~spmr02/rings/
http://paradise.caltech.edu/~cook/Workshop/Math/Borromean/Borrring.html
http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/~pbourke/surfaces/borromean/
http://seemanlab4.chem.nyu.edu/borro.html
Brunniam links are also interesting in connection with QM and QC.
http://www.cs.ubc.ca/nest/imager/contributions/scharein/brunnian/brunnian.ht
ml
http://members.tripod.com/vismath5/bor/bor7.htm
Happy N.Y. (which is already coming, here in Rome)
s.
Received on
Tue Dec 31 2002 - 13:12:30 PST
This message
: [
Message body
]
Next message
:
Tim May: "No infinities needed"
Previous message
:
Stephen Paul King: "Re: R: Quantum Probability and Decision Theory"
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
This archive was generated by
hypermail 2.3.0
: Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:08 PST