Hal Finney wrote:
>That would be true IF you include descriptions that are infinitely long.
>Then the set of all descriptions would be of cardinality c.  If your
>definition of a description implies that each one must be finite, then the
>set of all of them would have cardinality aleph-zero.
What about descriptions that are finite but would require an oracle machine 
to actually "compute"? We can define Omega, whose digits can be known only 
if you know whether each and every turing machine halts or not, in a finite 
number of words, but it can't be computed by any turing machine. If I'm 
remembering correctly there are also 2nd-order oracle machines that 
"compute" things 1st-order oracle machines cannot, and 3rd-order oracle 
machines, and so on, with a new level of oracle for each new ordinal 
(although I'm not sure if it makes sense to talk about aleph-one-order 
oracles or if it's just for the countable ordinals). This would suggest that 
no countable list of "finite descriptions" which includes descriptions for 
arbitrary oracle machines could ever be complete--as long as you have some 
finite rule for generating the list, you can use diagonalization to come up 
with a new number which has a finite description for some oracle machine.
I think that numbers like Omega really "exist" in the same sense as pi (in 
Platonia, if you will). I am not so sure about "random reals" which have no 
finite description of any kind. I don't know what implications this 
philosophy would have for a TOE...even a number like Omega can in some sense 
be computed "in the limit" by a turing machine (by initially assuming each 
turing machine fails to halt, then simulating each one and revising the 
number each time a particular machine is found to halt), even if the value 
of a particular digit cannot be decided in a finite time as with pi or other 
computable numbers. I assume this would probably be true for any number with 
a finite description. Doesn't the UDA argument in some sense depend on the 
idea of computing "in the limit" too?
--Jesse Mazer
_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
Received on Sat Nov 30 2002 - 14:00:30 PST