Re: Many Fermis Interpretation Paradox -- So why aren't they here?

From: Saibal Mitra <smitra.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 1996 15:25:41 +0200

----- Oorspronkelijk bericht -----
Van: "Bruno Marchal" <marchal.domain.name.hidden>
Aan: "Tim May" <tcmay.domain.name.hidden>; <everything-list.domain.name.hidden.com>
Verzonden: vrijdag 4 oktober 2002 18:13
Onderwerp: Re: Many Fermis Interpretation Paradox -- So why aren't they
here?


> At 9:36 -0700 1/10/2002, Tim May wrote:
>
> >MWI looks, then, like just another variant of "modal realism." To
> >wit, there IS a universe in which unicorns exist, and another in
> >which Germany won the Second World War, but these universes are
> >forever and completely out of touch with us.
>
> Not quite due to possible interferences. We do have empirical evidences
> for those "worlds" imo. (if only the two slits + Bell or better GHZ)


But quantum field theory can be derived from a completely classical
deterministic theory. See.e.g.:

1) Quantum Gravity as a Dissipative Deterministic System

Class.Quant.Grav. 16 (1999) 3263-3279

http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9903084


2) Quantum Mechanics and Determinism

http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0105105

3) How Does God Play Dice? (Pre-)Determinism at the Planck Scale

http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0104219
Received on Mon Oct 07 2002 - 09:30:54 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:07 PST