Re: Rucker's Infinity, Tegmark's TOE, and Cantor's AbsoluteInfinity

From: Bruno Marchal <marchal.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 17:51:39 +0200

Brent Meeker wrote:



>
>Bohm's QM is empirically identical with non-relativistic
>Schroedinger QM - makes exactly the same predictions. So what
>does it have to do with AI and the duplication of brains?


We (John + me) were refering to Bohm's book "the implicate order" where
Bohm takes some non comp stand.

Also his interpretation of QM is contradictory with comp, in the
sense than he does not attribute consciousness to the people
in the other branches, with the pretext they are lacking particles,
although he acknowledges implicitely that they exist and are functionally
similar to us (as SWE describes) See my paper Computation, Consciousness
and the Quantum where I say a little more on Bohm.

Bruno



-- 
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
Received on Fri Sep 06 2002 - 08:56:18 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:07 PST