Re: MWI, Copenhage, Randomness
This message
: [
Message body
] [ More options (
top
,
bottom
) ]
Related messages
: [
Next message
] [
Previous message
] [
In reply to
] [
Next in thread
]
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
From
: scerir <
scerir.domain.name.hidden
>
Date
: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 00:18:59 +0200
J. Mazer:
> But can decoherence really "forbid" macroscopic superpositions in principle,
> or only in practice?
Well, experiments have been done many times, showing
the effect of decoherence on (macroscopic) quantum superpositions
http://physicsweb.org/article/world/13/8/3/1
http://physicsweb.org/article/news/4/7/2/1
http://www.nature.com/cgi-taf/DynaPage.taf?file=/nature/journal/v406/n6791/abs/4
06043a0_fs.html
Received on
Thu Sep 05 2002 - 15:14:23 PDT
This message
: [
Message body
]
Next message
:
Wei Dai: "Schmidhuber II implies FTL communications"
Previous message
:
Sterritt, Lanny: "RE: "noisy digitizer" interpretation of QM"
In reply to
:
Jesse Mazer: "Re: MWI, Copenhage, Randomness"
Next in thread
:
Hal Finney: "Re: MWI, Copenhage, Randomness"
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
This archive was generated by
hypermail 2.3.0
: Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:07 PST