Re: Is Reality as function of Reference Frame?

From: Saibal Mitra <smitra.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 23:34:46 +0200

Hello Stephen,

Here are the references to 't Hooft's papers. Ref. 3 is written for
non-specialists, and should be easy to follow.

Greetings,
Saibal

[1] Quantum Gravity as a Dissipative Deterministic System

http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9903084

[2] Determinism in Free Bosons

http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0104080

[3] How Does God Play Dice? (Pre-)Determinism at the Planck Scale

http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0104219

[4] Quantum Mechanics and Determinism

http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0105105



----- Original Message -----
From: Stephen Paul King <stephenk1.domain.name.hidden>
To: <Fabric-of-Reality.domain.name.hidden>; <everything-list.domain.name.hidden.com>
Cc: <time.domain.name.hidden>
Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2002 4:51 PM
Subject: Re: Is Reality as function of Reference Frame?


> Dear Saibal,
>
> The idea that photons, electrons, etc. are "real" or not might make
> sense
> if we consider the role of virtual particle/wave fluctuations involved in
> the Hawking Black Hole evaporation process and the Unruh effect.
> From what I have read (cf. Kip S. Thorne, et al), it seems that the
> reality (or unreality or
> "virtuosity") of particles/waves depends on the reference frame of the
> observer - inertial ("free- falling") or non-inertial ("accelerated"),
etc.
> Perhaps consideration of the context of observation might help us get
> past
> this difficulty.
> Would you happen to know the reference to 't Hooft's paper?
>
> Kindest regards,
>
> Stephen
Received on Tue Jul 16 2002 - 14:35:23 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:07 PST