Re: Consistency? + Programs for G, G*, ...

From: Russell Standish <R.Standish.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 10:58:27 +1000 (EST)

Hal Ruhl wrote:
>
> Dear George:
>
> Upon further reflection I am of the opinion that the antipodal nature of
> the Everything and the Nothing in my set of ideas may impose a small amount
> of information into each sufficient to hold the two antipodal truths:
>
> Pole #1: Nothing? => true.
> Pole #2: Everything? => true.
>
> I believe that Russell Standish once expressed the idea the Nothing held
> one bit of information.

Yes, although I don't necessarily hold that idea any more. It was just
a woolly way of saying that perhaps the Nothing had even more
information than the Everything.

                                                Cheers

>
> From here the way to no information is to alternate between the two poles
> as I have proposed for other stability reasons. Thus the E/N system in
> total has no net information.
>
> This seems an interesting notion.
>
> Hal
>
>
>



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Russell Standish Director
High Performance Computing Support Unit, Phone 9385 6967, 8308 3119 (mobile)
UNSW SYDNEY 2052 Fax 9385 6965, 0425 253119 (")
Australia R.Standish.domain.name.hidden
Room 2075, Red Centre http://parallel.hpc.unsw.edu.au/rks
            International prefix +612, Interstate prefix 02
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Sun Aug 19 2001 - 18:14:39 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:07 PST