Re: Revised Computing Randomness

From: Hal Ruhl <hjr.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 22:26:42 -0700

Dear Russell:

Also since 1+ 1 = 2, 2 + 1 = 3, ... etc. is not everywhere elegant each
successive string is not necessarily more complex than its
preimage. However, in a cascade that is everywhere elegant each successive
string is more complex than its preimage by definition of elegant proof.

Hal
Received on Wed Apr 18 2001 - 19:53:34 PDT