Re: need for anthropic reasoning

From: Russell Standish <R.Standish.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 10:42:03 +1100 (EST)

Jacques Mallah wrote:
> Secondly, it well known that you believe a static string of bits could
> be conscious. Such a hypothetical observer would, by definition, be unable
> to take any actions. (Including thinking, but he would "have one thought
> stuck in his head".)
>
> - - - - - - -
> Jacques Mallah (jackmallah.domain.name.hidden)
> Physicist / Many Worlder / Devil's Advocate
> "I know what no one else knows" - 'Runaway Train', Soul Asylum
> My URL: http://hammer.prohosting.com/~mathmind/
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>

The static string needn't appear static to itself, only to some
outside observer. It should hopefully be well known that I beleive a
sense of time is essential for consciousness, even if that sense
of time appears to be a psychological illusion to other observers
living in a different time.

                                                Cheers

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Russell Standish Director
High Performance Computing Support Unit, Phone 9385 6967
UNSW SYDNEY 2052 Fax 9385 6965
Australia R.Standish.domain.name.hidden
Room 2075, Red Centre http://parallel.hpc.unsw.edu.au/rks
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tue Feb 20 2001 - 15:59:29 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:07 PST