Re: Out of line ?

From: James Higgo (co.uk) <"James>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 20:15:22 -0000

Yes, it was meant for the list.

Bruno, you may remember that in the original question I specifically asked
you _not_ to give me that answer! But I must confess the fact that your
thesis is a) closely aregued and b) in French has meant I have not absorbed
it fully. Sorry my crack at translation petered out - how is it getting on?

James
----- Original Message -----
From: Marchal <marchal.domain.name.hidden>
To: Brent Meeker <meekerdb.domain.name.hidden>; James Higgo <j.domain.name.hidden.co.uk>
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 3:52 PM
Subject: Out of line ?


> Hi Brent, Hi James,
>
> Thank you both for your commentaries.
> Are you sure you want do that out of line ? or is it
> an e-mailing error ?
>
> I begin also to understand why I have been
> not straightforward in my (first) attempt to
> answer James. The reason is that I am not
> representative of the way "information science"
> play a role in Physics.
>
> So an easy answer James could give to his friends is:
> "Bruno seems having proved that if we are machine
> then it is not consciousness which emerges from
> the material universe(s), it is the material
> universe(s) which emerge(s) from consciousness; and
> the laws of nature becames deducible from the
> psychology of machine".
> But I agree it is not a standard answer.
> Don't hesitate to criticize my proof ...
>
> Bruno
>
Received on Thu Feb 08 2001 - 12:15:03 PST