- Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Hal Ruhl <hjr.domain.name.hidden>

Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 23:31:11 -0700

I see it as a simple exercise to derive both quantum mechanics and

relativity on a discrete physical system that is isomorphic to a recursive

enumeration theorem cascade in an incomplete, finite, consistent Formal

Axiomatic System [ifc-FAS]. A cellular automaton if you will. However,

the incompleteness must be incrementally resolved which makes the system

discontinuously computational - i. e. non deterministic. In this view

information [relative] as measured by AIT program length [each such program

being the proof of an individual member of the cascade] monotonically

accumulates.

The universe I think is really quite simply described.

Model at: http://www.connix.com/~hjr/model01.html

Hal

At 10/26/00, you wrote:

*>Bruno writes in the article Computation, Consciousness and the Quantum (
*

*><http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/CC&Q.pdf>http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/CC&Q.pdf
*

*>)
*

*>
*

*>``All sufficiently realist interpretations of quantum mechanics accept the
*

*>existence of parallel situations.´´
*

*>
*

*>I think that this is true for interpretations that assume that quantum
*

*>mechanics is fundamental. However, 't Hooft has recently shown that it is
*

*>possible to derive quantum mechanics from a certain class of deterministic
*

*>models, avoiding the usual problems of hidden variables. In fact his
*

*>theory doesn't treat particles as elements of physical reality at all.
*

*>Particles only arise in the statistical treatment of the deterministic
*

*>model. Therefore Bell's theorem doesn't apply. See:
*

*>
*

*><http://www.phys.uu.nl/~thooft/quantloss/index.htm>http://www.phys.uu.nl/~thooft/quantloss/index.htm
*

*>
*

*> http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-th/0003005
*

*>
*

*> <http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/gr-qc/9903084>http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/gr-qc/9903084
*

*>
*

*>Saibal
*

Received on Thu Oct 26 2000 - 20:39:59 PDT

Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 23:31:11 -0700

I see it as a simple exercise to derive both quantum mechanics and

relativity on a discrete physical system that is isomorphic to a recursive

enumeration theorem cascade in an incomplete, finite, consistent Formal

Axiomatic System [ifc-FAS]. A cellular automaton if you will. However,

the incompleteness must be incrementally resolved which makes the system

discontinuously computational - i. e. non deterministic. In this view

information [relative] as measured by AIT program length [each such program

being the proof of an individual member of the cascade] monotonically

accumulates.

The universe I think is really quite simply described.

Model at: http://www.connix.com/~hjr/model01.html

Hal

At 10/26/00, you wrote:

Received on Thu Oct 26 2000 - 20:39:59 PDT

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:07 PST
*