- Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Hal Ruhl <hjr.domain.name.hidden>

Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 00:42:45 -0700

My particular approach is to base the universe on the idea that it is a

physical isomorphism of but one of a "set" of incomplete, finite,

consistent FAS [ifc-FAS]. Members of this "set" occasionally [no "time"

connotations] "freeze out" spontaneously from a growing, seething, foamy

fractal of bifurcations [say zeros and ones] I call a superverse. The

superverse itself spontaneously arose from no absolute information because

"no absolute information" is itself incomplete. It can not answer the

question of its own stability.

The simplest form of such a resulting initiating incomplete fc-FAS is one

with a single axiom containing relative information only and a set of rules

for operating on the axiom.

The incompleteness of this FAS makes it indeterminant - it continues to

grow by an ongoing Godelian type of "freezing out" process from the

superverse. I identify these logic growth events as isomorphic [in our

universe] to quantum perturbations. Aside from its incompleteness

resolution process, the only "dynamic" supportable by such an ifc-FAS is a

recursively enumerated cascade "set" of theorems that starts with the

single axiom.

The simplest SAS capable physical isomorphism seems to be a 3 space grid of

isolated points that can not migrate, but can "relocate" relative to

neighbor points within their region of the grid in a quantified way. Each

configuration is isomorphic to a theorem of the ifc-FAS.

While the points are "identical" they are distinguishable by their relative

position thus they seem to form a "set".

A "quantum mechanics" and a "relativity" seem easy to derive on such a base.

If I understand Russell correctly this may be a Hilbert space in the sense

that the superverse may be a "continuous" set of bifurcations, but I am not

a mathematician. However, each ifc-FAS describes a finite discrete subset

of this "space".

So it seems to me that the universe is a "set" on multiple scales.

If anyone is interested my model such as it currently stands is at:

http://www.connix.com/~hjr/model01.html

Hal

Received on Tue Oct 24 2000 - 21:51:42 PDT

Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 00:42:45 -0700

My particular approach is to base the universe on the idea that it is a

physical isomorphism of but one of a "set" of incomplete, finite,

consistent FAS [ifc-FAS]. Members of this "set" occasionally [no "time"

connotations] "freeze out" spontaneously from a growing, seething, foamy

fractal of bifurcations [say zeros and ones] I call a superverse. The

superverse itself spontaneously arose from no absolute information because

"no absolute information" is itself incomplete. It can not answer the

question of its own stability.

The simplest form of such a resulting initiating incomplete fc-FAS is one

with a single axiom containing relative information only and a set of rules

for operating on the axiom.

The incompleteness of this FAS makes it indeterminant - it continues to

grow by an ongoing Godelian type of "freezing out" process from the

superverse. I identify these logic growth events as isomorphic [in our

universe] to quantum perturbations. Aside from its incompleteness

resolution process, the only "dynamic" supportable by such an ifc-FAS is a

recursively enumerated cascade "set" of theorems that starts with the

single axiom.

The simplest SAS capable physical isomorphism seems to be a 3 space grid of

isolated points that can not migrate, but can "relocate" relative to

neighbor points within their region of the grid in a quantified way. Each

configuration is isomorphic to a theorem of the ifc-FAS.

While the points are "identical" they are distinguishable by their relative

position thus they seem to form a "set".

A "quantum mechanics" and a "relativity" seem easy to derive on such a base.

If I understand Russell correctly this may be a Hilbert space in the sense

that the superverse may be a "continuous" set of bifurcations, but I am not

a mathematician. However, each ifc-FAS describes a finite discrete subset

of this "space".

So it seems to me that the universe is a "set" on multiple scales.

If anyone is interested my model such as it currently stands is at:

http://www.connix.com/~hjr/model01.html

Hal

Received on Tue Oct 24 2000 - 21:51:42 PDT

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:07 PST
*